<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Art Market Blog &#8211; Art Market Confidence Index Seriously Flawed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artmarketblog.com/2008/02/15/art-market-blog-art-market-confidence-index-seriously-flawed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artmarketblog.com/2008/02/15/art-market-blog-art-market-confidence-index-seriously-flawed/</link>
	<description>Art Market Analysis by Nic Forrest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surrealmuse Studios &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Consumer Confidence in the Art Market</title>
		<link>http://www.artmarketblog.com/2008/02/15/art-market-blog-art-market-confidence-index-seriously-flawed/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Surrealmuse Studios &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Consumer Confidence in the Art Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artforprofits.wordpress.com/?p=391#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>[...] it dropped by 40% over the past six months in January!&#160; However, according to an article by Nicholas Forrest the method to collect data for this index is seriously flawed.&#160; So who is an artist and art [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it dropped by 40% over the past six months in January!&nbsp; However, according to an article by Nicholas Forrest the method to collect data for this index is seriously flawed.&nbsp; So who is an artist and art [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artbyus</title>
		<link>http://www.artmarketblog.com/2008/02/15/art-market-blog-art-market-confidence-index-seriously-flawed/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>artbyus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artforprofits.wordpress.com/?p=391#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>what they also fail to take into consideration is the participants&#039; motivation and level of participation in the art market - not everybody has the art as investment approach to the art market. In which case those questions are rather irrelevant to start with - people buying art to decorate their home will hardly worry too much about prices in three months, the current economic temperature, etc..
The art market does not only consist of art investors - those may be the big spenders, but the more consistent spenders are those that purchase for pleasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what they also fail to take into consideration is the participants&#8217; motivation and level of participation in the art market &#8211; not everybody has the art as investment approach to the art market. In which case those questions are rather irrelevant to start with &#8211; people buying art to decorate their home will hardly worry too much about prices in three months, the current economic temperature, etc..<br />
The art market does not only consist of art investors &#8211; those may be the big spenders, but the more consistent spenders are those that purchase for pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entropik</title>
		<link>http://www.artmarketblog.com/2008/02/15/art-market-blog-art-market-confidence-index-seriously-flawed/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>entropik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artforprofits.wordpress.com/?p=391#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s see this : http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4d79j_indice-acmi-amci-aicm-maci-maic-etc_tech

sorry it&#039;s in french, I just proove by some &quot;clicks&quot; that we can rise this ACMI like we want...
this is simply a QCM, a HTML Questionnaire Multiple Choice without statistics inside !

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s see this : <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4d79j_indice-acmi-amci-aicm-maci-maic-etc_tech" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4d79j_indice-acmi-amci-aicm-maci-maic-etc_tech</a></p>
<p>sorry it&#8217;s in french, I just proove by some &#8220;clicks&#8221; that we can rise this ACMI like we want&#8230;<br />
this is simply a QCM, a HTML Questionnaire Multiple Choice without statistics inside !<br />
 <img src='http://www.artmarketblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

